Robinson v. State
348 S.W.3d 134, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1197, 2011 WL 4357824
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robinson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 232 →
Opinion
ORDER
Keith T. Robinson appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s [135]*135findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robinson v. State, 348 S.W.3d 134, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1197, 2011 WL 4357824 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
348 S.W.3d 134 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.