Robinson v. State

318 S.W.3d 321, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1080, 2010 WL 3314781
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robinson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 232
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 24, 2010·No. ED 93931·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Corry Robinson (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his amended Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Movant argues that the motion court clearly erred because his plea counsel provided him ineffective assistance by failing to adequately investigate his case, thus rendering his guilty plea involuntary. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find Movant is entitled to no relief on appeal. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the motion court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. State, 318 S.W.3d 321, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1080, 2010 WL 3314781 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

318 S.W.3d 321 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Xh
318 S.W.3d 321 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)