Robinson v. State

247 S.W.3d 607, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 352, 2008 WL 710040
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 18, 2008
DocketED 89590
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 247 S.W.3d 607 (Robinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robinson v. State, 247 S.W.3d 607, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 352, 2008 WL 710040 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Ronald Robinson, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing on the two claims that are the subject of this appeal. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. PINTOR-DIAZ
247 S.W.3d 607 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 S.W.3d 607, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 352, 2008 WL 710040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-state-moctapp-2008.