Robinson v. State

214 S.W.3d 412, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 291, 2007 WL 509752
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robinson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 37
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 20, 2007·No. No. ED 88008·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Justin Robinson appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Robinson argued that his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to depose a witness and request a mistrial when that witness did not appear at trial. The motion court’s findings and conclusions were not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. State, 214 S.W.3d 412, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 291, 2007 WL 509752 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

214 S.W.3d 412 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.