Robinson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Robinson v. State

144 S.W.3d 316, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1346, 2004 WL 2093455

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robinson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 37 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 21, 2004·No. No. ED 83102·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Frederick Robinson, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Frederick Robinson, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Robinson v. State, 144 S.W.3d 316, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1346, 2004 WL 2093455 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

144 S.W.3d 316 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.