Nichols v. Hardegree
This text of 79 So. 598 (Nichols v. Hardegree) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The failure of the appellant to assign any errors requires the affirmance of the judgment below. Rule 1, Supreme Court Prac. (20 South. iv); Civil Code, p. 1506; Pettibone v. Bank, 156 Ala. 666, 46 South. 751; Amerson v. Corona Coal Co., 194 Ala. 175, 69 South. 601; Kinnon v. L. & N. R. R. Co., 187 Ala. 480, 65 South. 397; Dickens v. Dickens, 174 Ala. 345, 56 South. 809; Brahan v. Collins, Minor, 169; Chavers v. Mayo, ante, p. 128, 79 South. 594.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
79 So. 598, 202 Ala. 132, 1918 Ala. LEXIS 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-hardegree-ala-1918.