Williams v. Ensley Motor Co.
94 So. 612, 19 Ala. App. 57, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 32
This text of 94 So. 612 (Williams v. Ensley Motor Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Williams v. Ensley Motor Co., 94 So. 612, 19 Ala. App. 57, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 32 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922).
Opinion
On November 30,’ 1922, this cause was submitted in this court on motion to affirm for want of assignment of errors. This motion must of necessity be granted. Rule 1 Sup. Court Practice,. Code 1907,-p. 1506. *
The failure of appellant to assign errors requires the affirmance of the. judgment appealed from. Nichols v. Hardegree, 202 Ala. 132, 79 South. 598.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Swinea v. City of Florence
183 So. 686 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1938)
Robinson v. Sandlin
133 So. 744 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1931)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
94 So. 612, 19 Ala. App. 57, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-ensley-motor-co-alactapp-1922.