Williams v. Ensley Motor Co.
94 So. 612, 19 Ala. App. 57, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 32
Opinion
On November 30,’ 1922, this cause was submitted in this court on motion to affirm for want of assignment of errors. This motion must of necessity be granted. Rule 1 Sup. Court Practice,. Code 1907,-p. 1506. *
The failure of appellant to assign errors requires the affirmance of the. judgment appealed from. Nichols v. Hardegree, 202 Ala. 132, 79 South. 598.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. Ensley Motor Co., 94 So. 612, 19 Ala. App. 57, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 32 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922).
94 So. 612 (Williams v. Ensley Motor Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Swinea v. City of Florence
183 So. 686 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1938)
Robinson v. Sandlin
133 So. 744 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1931)