Home/Alabama Court of Appeals/Swinea v. City of Florence

Swinea v. City of Florence

183 So. 686, 28 Ala. App. 332, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 197
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 4, 1938
Docket8 Div. 637.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 183 So. 686 (Swinea v. City of Florence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swinea v. City of Florence, 183 So. 686, 28 Ala. App. 332, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 197 (Ala. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

*333 SAMFORD, Judge.

Supreme Court Rule One re-1 quires assignments of error to be written upon the transcript. There is no such assignment of error in this case. In the1 absence of such assignment of error the judgment must be affirmed. Williams v. Ensley Motor Co., 19 Ala.App. 57, 94 So. 612; Nichols v. Hardegree, 202 Ala. 132, 79 So. 598; Kinnon v. Louisville & N. R. Co., 187 Ala. 480, 65 So. 397. Cases of this character do not come under the influence of Section 3258 of the Code of 1923.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parks v. City of Montgomery
92 So. 2d 683 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
183 So. 686, 28 Ala. App. 332, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swinea-v-city-of-florence-alactapp-1938.