Swinea v. City of Florence
183 So. 686, 28 Ala. App. 332, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 197
Opinion
Supreme Court Rule One re-1 quires assignments of error to be written upon the transcript. There is no such assignment of error in this case. In the1 absence of such assignment of error the judgment must be affirmed. Williams v. Ensley Motor Co., 19 Ala.App. 57, 94 So. 612; Nichols v. Hardegree, 202 Ala. 132, 79 So. 598; Kinnon v. Louisville & N. R. Co., 187 Ala. 480, 65 So. 397. Cases of this character do not come under the influence of Section 3258 of the Code of 1923.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Swinea v. City of Florence, 183 So. 686, 28 Ala. App. 332, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 197 (Ala. Ct. App. 1938).
183 So. 686 (Swinea v. City of Florence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Parks v. City of Montgomery
92 So. 2d 683 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1957)