Lindsey v. State

5 So. 2d 352, 30 Ala. App. 318, 1941 Ala. App. LEXIS 166
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 16, 1941
Docket4 Div. 675.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 5 So. 2d 352 (Lindsey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lindsey v. State, 5 So. 2d 352, 30 Ala. App. 318, 1941 Ala. App. LEXIS 166 (Ala. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

SIMPSON, Judge.

Prosecution for bastardy.

Supreme Court Rule of Practice No. 1, Code 1940, Tit. 7 Appendix, is applicable in this case. The exactions therein imposed upon the appellant have been ignored. There are no assignments of error upon the transcript, so this court is without authority to undertake a review. The judgment must be affirmed. Williams v. State, 117 Ala. 199, 23 So. 42; Bragg v. State, 28 Ala.App. 335, 183 So. 683; Nichols v. Hardegree, 202 Ala. 132, 79 So. 598; Peever v. City Com’rs of Florence, 26 Ala.App. 213, 157 So. 79.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 So. 2d 352, 30 Ala. App. 318, 1941 Ala. App. LEXIS 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindsey-v-state-alactapp-1941.