Bragg v. State

183 So. 683, 28 Ala. App. 335, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 200
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 16, 1938·No. 7 Div. 320.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

This is a proceeding in bastardy under Section 3416 et seq. of the Code of 1923. -While the Statute (Code of 1923, Section 3422) requires that-the proceeding shall be brought in the name of the State, a bastardy proceeding is not a criminal case within the meaning of the Statute, which dispenses with the assignments of error in criminal cases taken from the lower court to the appellate court on appeal. This case is submitted without assignments of error, and, therefore, there is nothing for us tb pass upon.

The judgment is affirmed on the authority of Borden v. State, 27 Ala.App. 271, 170 So. 98; Jackson v. State, 26 Ala.App. 257, 157 So. 872; Williams v. State, 117 Ala. 199, 23 So. 42.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bragg v. State, 183 So. 683, 28 Ala. App. 335, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 200 (Ala. Ct. App. 1938).

183 So. 683 (Bragg v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lindsey v. State
5 So. 2d 352 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1941)
Griffin v. State
184 So. 284 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1938)
Morgan v. State
182 So. 468 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1938)