Peever v. City Com'rs of Florence

Alabama Court of Appeals

Peever v. City Com'rs of Florence

157 So. 79, 26 Ala. App. 213, 1934 Ala. App. LEXIS 108

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 5, 1934

Docket8 Div. 973.

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 157 So. 79 (Peever v. City Com'rs of Florence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peever v. City Com'rs of Florence, 157 So. 79, 26 Ala. App. 213, 1934 Ala. App. LEXIS 108 (Ala. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, Judge.

It is enough to say, in disposing of this appeal, that the prosecution is for a violation of an ordinance of the city of Florence ; and that, Code 1923, § 3258, not applying (Casteel v. City of Decatur, 215 Ala. 4, 109 So. 571), and there being no assignment of error “written upon the transcript,” in accordance with Supreme Court Rule of Practice No. 1 (Code 1923, vol. 4, p. 880) there is nothing presented for our decision. Halle v. Brooks, 209 Ala. 486, 96 So. 341.

It seems anomalous to affirm a judgment which is clearly erroneous (Wright v. City of Bessemer, 209 Ala. 374, 96 So. 316), but we are not permitted (Code 1923, § 7318) to make shipwreck of the rules of practice — so vital ■to an orderly administration of the law — in order to save possible hardship in an isolated case. Halle v. Brooks, supra.

The judgment appealed from is affirmedi

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI