Crim v. Gilbert

Supreme Court of Alabama

Crim v. Gilbert

104 So. 2d 632, 267 Ala. 665, 1958 Ala. LEXIS 414

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJuly 24, 1958

Docket7 Div. 388

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 104 So. 2d 632 (Crim v. Gilbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crim v. Gilbert, 104 So. 2d 632, 267 Ala. 665, 1958 Ala. LEXIS 414 (Ala. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

COLEMAN, Justice.

There being no assignment of error “bound with the transcript,” an order of affirmance is due to be entered; and it is so ordered. Code 1940, Tit. 7, Appendix, Rule 1, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court; Wetzel v. Hobbs, 249 Ala. 434, 31 So.2d 639; Halle v. Brooks, 209 Ala. 486, 96 So. 341; Nichols v. Hardegree, 202 Ala. 132, 79 So. 598; Dobson v. Deason, 258 Ala. 219, 61 So.2d 764; 2 Ala.Dig., Appeal and Error, ^753(2).

Affirmed.

LAWSON, SIMPSON, and MERRILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COLEMAN, Justice.

There being no assignment of error “bound with the transcript,” an order of affirmance is due to be entered; and it is so ordered. Code 1940, Tit. 7, Appendix, Rule 1, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court; Wetzel v. Hobbs, 249 Ala. 434, 31 So.2d 639; Halle v. Brooks, 209 Ala. 486, 96 So. 341; Nichols v. Hardegree, 202 Ala. 132, 79 So. 598; Dobson v. Deason, 258 Ala. 219, 61 So.2d 764; 2 Ala.Dig., Appeal and Error, ^753(2).

Affirmed.

LAWSON, SIMPSON, and MERRILL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 So. 2d 632, 267 Ala. 665, 1958 Ala. LEXIS 414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crim-v-gilbert-ala-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack