Thompson v. City of Florence

Alabama Court of Appeals

Thompson v. City of Florence

130 So. 2d 350, 41 Ala. App. 280

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 14, 1961

Docket8 Div. 718

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 130 So. 2d 350 (Thompson v. City of Florence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. City of Florence, 130 So. 2d 350, 41 Ala. App. 280 (Ala. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

PRICE, Judge.

This appeal is taken from a judgment of the Law and Equity Court of Lauderdale County adjudging appellant guilty of violating an ordinance of the appellee,- City of Florence.

The assignment of errors is typed on a separate sheet of paper, which is attached to a page of the transcript with gummed tape.

An assignment of errors on a separate sheet of paper attached to a page of the transcript with gummed tape is not an assignment of errors “written or typed upon transcript paper and bound with the transcript” as required by Supreme Court Rule 1. Code of Ala., Tit. 7 Appendix. Patton v. Colbert County, 265 Ala. 682, 92 So.2d 691. Also see, State ex rel. Strange v. King, 269 Ala. 196, 112 So.2d 457; Mitchell v. Marshall County Livestock Market, Inc., 32 Ala.App. 42, 21 So.2d 446; Skinner v. Jackson, 28 Ala.App. 227, 182 So. 92.

There being no assignment of errors “written or typed upon transcript paper and bound with the transcript,” an order of affirmance is due to be entered. Erwin v. Erwin, 269 Ala. 632, 114 So.2d 918; Crim v. Gilbert, 267 Ala. 665, 104 So. 2d 632.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRICE, Judge.

This appeal is taken from a judgment of the Law and Equity Court of Lauderdale County adjudging appellant guilty of violating an ordinance of the appellee,- City of Florence.

The assignment of errors is typed on a separate sheet of paper, which is attached to a page of the transcript with gummed tape.

An assignment of errors on a separate sheet of paper attached to a page of the transcript with gummed tape is not an assignment of errors “written or typed upon transcript paper and bound with the transcript” as required by Supreme Court Rule 1. Code of Ala., Tit. 7 Appendix. Patton v. Colbert County, 265 Ala. 682, 92 So.2d 691. Also see, State ex rel. Strange v. King, 269 Ala. 196, 112 So.2d 457; Mitchell v. Marshall County Livestock Market, Inc., 32 Ala.App. 42, 21 So.2d 446; Skinner v. Jackson, 28 Ala.App. 227, 182 So. 92.

There being no assignment of errors “written or typed upon transcript paper and bound with the transcript,” an order of affirmance is due to be entered. Erwin v. Erwin, 269 Ala. 632, 114 So.2d 918; Crim v. Gilbert, 267 Ala. 665, 104 So. 2d 632.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 So. 2d 350, 41 Ala. App. 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-city-of-florence-alactapp-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack