Mitchell v. Marshall County Livestock Market, Inc.

Alabama Court of Appeals

Mitchell v. Marshall County Livestock Market, Inc.

21 So. 2d 446, 32 Ala. App. 42, 1945 Ala. App. LEXIS 326

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 13, 1945

Docket8 Div. 453.

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 21 So. 2d 446 (Mitchell v. Marshall County Livestock Market, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mitchell v. Marshall County Livestock Market, Inc., 21 So. 2d 446, 32 Ala. App. 42, 1945 Ala. App. LEXIS 326 (Ala. Ct. App. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

CARR, Judge.

In this case the purported assignments of error are typed on a separate sheet of paper and attached to a page of the transcript with two metal fasteners, ordinarily known as gem clips.

Supreme Court Rule 1, Code 1940, Tit. 7 appendix, provides: “In assigning errors, it shall be sufficient to state concisely, in writing, in what the error consists, which assignment must be written upon the transcript * *

For the sake of the security and permanency of the records, the appellate courts have cautiously guarded the requirements of this rule. Skinner v. Jackson, 28 Ala.App. 227, 182 So. 92; Pugh v. Hardman, 151 Ala. 248, 44 So. 389; Hunter v. Louisville & N. R. Co., 150 Ala. 594, 43 So. 802, 9 L.R.A.,N.S., 848; E. W. Gates Lumber Co. v. Givens, 181 Ala. 670, 61 So. 330; Moon v. Butler & Co., 9 Ala.App. 438, 62 So. 1019.

The judgment from which this appeal is taken will be affirmed for want of assignments of error as required.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI