Pugh v. Hardman

44 So. 389, 151 Ala. 248, 1907 Ala. LEXIS 546
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 13, 1907·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The assignments of error are not made on the record, but on a separate piece of paper, and attached at the upper edge of such paper to a page of the transcript. This was held, in the case of Hunter v. L. & N. R. R. Co., 150 Ala. 43 South. 802, not to be an assignment of errors on the record. On the authority of that case, the present case must be affirmed for want of assignment of errors.

A (firmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pugh v. Hardman, 44 So. 389, 151 Ala. 248, 1907 Ala. LEXIS 546 (Ala. 1907).

44 So. 389 (Pugh v. Hardman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fuller v. Porter
148 So. 2d 648 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1963)
Sparks v. State
119 So. 2d 596 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1959)
State ex rel. Strange v. King
112 So. 2d 457 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1959)
Patton v. Colbert County
92 So. 2d 691 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1957)
Mann v. Department of Industrial Relations
50 So. 2d 786 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1951)
Mitchell v. Marshall County Livestock Market, Inc.
21 So. 2d 446 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1945)
Skinner v. Jackson
182 So. 92 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1938)
Henry v. Stabler
153 So. 660 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1934)
Smitherman v. State
78 So. 417 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1918)
Moon v. Butler & Co.
62 So. 1019 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1913)