Home/Alabama Court of Appeals/Hoyle v. Hill

Hoyle v. Hill

64 So. 2d 895, 37 Ala. App. 160, 1953 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 153
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 28, 1953
Docket5 Div. 424
StatusPublished

This text of 64 So. 2d 895 (Hoyle v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoyle v. Hill, 64 So. 2d 895, 37 Ala. App. 160, 1953 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 153 (Ala. Ct. App. 1953).

Opinion

CARR, Presiding Judge.

The record in this case does not contain any assignments of error. The judgment below must therefore be affirmed. Robinson v. Sandlin, 24 Ala.App. 235, 133 So. 744; Nichols v. Hardegree, 202 Ala. 132. 79 So. 598.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nichols v. Hardegree
79 So. 598 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1918)
Robinson v. Sandlin
133 So. 744 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 So. 2d 895, 37 Ala. App. 160, 1953 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoyle-v-hill-alactapp-1953.