Hoyle v. Hill

64 So. 2d 895, 37 Ala. App. 160, 1953 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 153
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided April 28, 1953·No. 5 Div. 424·Published

Opinion

CARR, Presiding Judge.

The record in this case does not contain any assignments of error. The judgment below must therefore be affirmed. Robinson v. Sandlin, 24 Ala.App. 235, 133 So. 744; Nichols v. Hardegree, 202 Ala. 132. 79 So. 598.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hoyle v. Hill, 64 So. 2d 895, 37 Ala. App. 160, 1953 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 153 (Ala. Ct. App. 1953).

64 So. 2d 895 (Hoyle v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nichols v. Hardegree
79 So. 598 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1918)
Robinson v. Sandlin
133 So. 744 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1931)