North Birmingham Trust & Savings Bank v. Sessions

Supreme Court of Alabama

North Birmingham Trust & Savings Bank v. Sessions

127 So. 163, 220 Ala. 594, 1930 Ala. LEXIS 66

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedMarch 20, 1930

Docket4 Div. 471.

StatusPublished

This text of 127 So. 163 (North Birmingham Trust & Savings Bank v. Sessions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

North Birmingham Trust & Savings Bank v. Sessions, 127 So. 163, 220 Ala. 594, 1930 Ala. LEXIS 66 (Ala. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

BROWN, J.

, This appeal is prosecuted from an order of the circuit court denying the appellant’s motion to substitute lost record in a pending cause, authorized by § 10137 of the Code (1923).

There is no assignment of errors on the record, and in the absence thereof nothing is presented for review. Redd Chemical & Nitrate Co. v. W. T. Clay Mercantile Co., et al., 219 Ala. 478, 122 So. 652; Nichols v. Hardegree, 202 Ala. 132, 79 So. 598.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI