Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Thornburg

Supreme Court

Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Thornburg

475 U.S. 1006, 106 S. Ct. 1177

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedFebruary 24, 1986

DocketNo. 85-568

StatusPublished

This text of 475 U.S. 1006 (Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Thornburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Thornburg, 475 U.S. 1006, 106 S. Ct. 1177 (1986).

Pincite

Opinion

[1007]*1007Sup. Ct. N. C. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 474 U. S. 1018.] Motions of Edison Electric Institute and New England Electric System for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted. Motion of ap-pellees for divided argument denied.

Justice Brennan would grant this motion. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1007]*1007Sup. Ct. N. C. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 474 U. S. 1018.] Motions of Edison Electric Institute and New England Electric System for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted. Motion of ap-pellees for divided argument denied.

Justice Brennan would grant this motion. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

475 U.S. 1006, 106 S. Ct. 1177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nantahala-power-light-co-v-thornburg-scotus-1986.