Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Thornburg

475 U.S. 1006, 106 S. Ct. 1177

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Thornburg. Read the opinion of the Court — 476 U.S. 953 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 24, 1986·No. No. 85-568·Published

Opinion

[1007]*1007Sup. Ct. N. C. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 474 U. S. 1018.] Motions of Edison Electric Institute and New England Electric System for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted. Motion of ap-pellees for divided argument denied.

Justice Brennan would grant this motion. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Justice Brennan would grant this motion. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.

Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Thornburg, 475 U.S. 1006, 106 S. Ct. 1177 (1986).

Pincite

475 U.S. 1006 (Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Thornburg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.