Moore v. State

390 S.W.3d 265, 2013 WL 326992, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 105
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Moore v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 935
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 29, 2013·No. No. ED 98145·Published

Opinion

ORDER .

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Remus Moore appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. State, 390 S.W.3d 265, 2013 WL 326992, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 105 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

390 S.W.3d 265 (Moore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.