Moore v. State

330 S.W.3d 502, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 262, 2010 WL 785343
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 9, 2010·No. ED 93409·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Victor Moore appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. State, 330 S.W.3d 502, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 262, 2010 WL 785343 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

330 S.W.3d 502 (Moore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Robinson
330 S.W.3d 502 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)