Moore v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Moore v. State

330 S.W.3d 502, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 262, 2010 WL 785343

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 9, 2010

DocketED 93409

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 330 S.W.3d 502 (Moore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moore v. State, 330 S.W.3d 502, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 262, 2010 WL 785343 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Victor Moore appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Victor Moore appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

330 S.W.3d 502, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 262, 2010 WL 785343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-state-moctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack