Moore v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Moore v. State

352 S.W.3d 416, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1482, 2011 WL 5369518

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 8, 2011

DocketED 95381

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 352 S.W.3d 416 (Moore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moore v. State, 352 S.W.3d 416, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1482, 2011 WL 5369518 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darnell Moore (Movant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant asserts that the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that plea counsel was ineffective for failing to advise Movant of the State’s initial offer and failing to inform the prosecutor that Movant wished to accept that offer.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI