Moore v. State
403 S.W.3d 681, 2013 WL 3477286, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 824
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Moore v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1025 →
Opinion
[682]*682ORDER
The movant, Jeffrey Moore, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
We affirm the motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moore v. State, 403 S.W.3d 681, 2013 WL 3477286, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 824 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).
403 S.W.3d 681 (Moore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.