Moore v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Moore v. State

390 S.W.3d 265, 2013 WL 326992, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 105

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 29, 2013

DocketNo. ED 98145

StatusPublished

This text of 390 S.W.3d 265 (Moore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moore v. State, 390 S.W.3d 265, 2013 WL 326992, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 105 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER .

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Remus Moore appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER .

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Remus Moore appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

390 S.W.3d 265, 2013 WL 326992, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-state-moctapp-2013.