Moore v. State
377 S.W.3d 610, 2012 WL 3805701, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1081
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Moore v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 935 →
Opinion
ORDER
Patrick Moore, Jr. appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court did not err in denying Moore’s claim for ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moore v. State, 377 S.W.3d 610, 2012 WL 3805701, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1081 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
377 S.W.3d 610 (Moore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.