Miller v. State

365 S.W.3d 620, 2012 WL 1416765, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 543
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 24, 2012·No. ED 97087·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*621 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Earl D. Miller (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Washington County denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims that the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that his plea counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to obtain a change of venue.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. State, 365 S.W.3d 620, 2012 WL 1416765, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 543 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

365 S.W.3d 620 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

National City Bank v. Wilkerson
365 S.W.3d 620 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)