Miller v. State
296 S.W.3d 471, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 759, 2009 WL 1514454
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 128 →
Opinion
ORDER
William Miller appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. State, 296 S.W.3d 471, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 759, 2009 WL 1514454 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
296 S.W.3d 471 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ryan v. RAYTOWN DODGE CO.
296 S.W.3d 471 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)