Miller v. State

277 S.W.3d 888, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 222, 2009 WL 595973
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 128
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 10, 2009·No. ED 91266·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Dwayne Miller, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. State, 277 S.W.3d 888, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 222, 2009 WL 595973 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

277 S.W.3d 888 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Snelling v. SPRINGBOK ENTERPRISE
277 S.W.3d 888 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)