Miller v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Miller v. State

295 S.W.3d 601, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1623, 2009 WL 3849671

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 27, 2009·No. WD 70060·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Dennis G. Miller was convicted, after a jury trial, of first-degree murder, first-degree assault, and two counts of armed criminal action. He appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under *602 Supreme Court Rule 29.15 following an evidentiary hearing. In his sole Point Relied On, Miller asserts that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to request jury instructions on lesser included offenses to first-degree assault. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Dennis G. Miller was convicted, after a jury trial, of first-degree murder, first-degree assault, and two counts of armed criminal action. He appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under *602 Supreme Court Rule 29.15 following an evidentiary hearing. In his sole Point Relied On, Miller asserts that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to request jury instructions on lesser included offenses to first-degree assault. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Miller v. State, 295 S.W.3d 601, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1623, 2009 WL 3849671 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

295 S.W.3d 601 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related