Miller v. State

365 S.W.3d 620, 2012 WL 1416765, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 543
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 24, 2012
DocketED 97087
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 365 S.W.3d 620 (Miller v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. State, 365 S.W.3d 620, 2012 WL 1416765, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 543 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

*621 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Earl D. Miller (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Washington County denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims that the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that his plea counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to obtain a change of venue.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

National City Bank v. Wilkerson
365 S.W.3d 620 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
365 S.W.3d 620, 2012 WL 1416765, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-state-moctapp-2012.