Miller v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Miller v. State

404 S.W.3d 931, 2013 WL 4053160, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 940

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 13, 2013·No. No. WD 75730·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Charles Miller appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion, following an evidentiary hearing. Miller contends the motion court clearly erred because his plea counsel provided him ineffective assistance that impinged on the voluntariness and understanding of his guilty pleas. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

Charles Miller appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion, following an evidentiary hearing. Miller contends the motion court clearly erred because his plea counsel provided him ineffective assistance that impinged on the voluntariness and understanding of his guilty pleas. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Miller v. State, 404 S.W.3d 931, 2013 WL 4053160, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 940 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

404 S.W.3d 931 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.