Miller v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Miller v. State

404 S.W.3d 931, 2013 WL 4053160, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 940

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 13, 2013

DocketNo. WD 75730

StatusPublished

This text of 404 S.W.3d 931 (Miller v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. State, 404 S.W.3d 931, 2013 WL 4053160, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 940 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Charles Miller appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion, following an evidentiary hearing. Miller contends the motion court clearly erred because his plea counsel provided him ineffective assistance that impinged on the voluntariness and understanding of his guilty pleas. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

Charles Miller appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion, following an evidentiary hearing. Miller contends the motion court clearly erred because his plea counsel provided him ineffective assistance that impinged on the voluntariness and understanding of his guilty pleas. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

404 S.W.3d 931, 2013 WL 4053160, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-state-moctapp-2013.