Miller v. State
282 S.W.3d 413, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 830, 2009 WL 1203363
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 128 →
Opinion
ORDER
Larry Miller (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. State, 282 S.W.3d 413, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 830, 2009 WL 1203363 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
282 S.W.3d 413 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Meeks v. Lewis
282 S.W.3d 413 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)