Meeks v. Lewis

282 S.W.3d 413, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 685, 2009 WL 1203364
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 5, 2009·No. ED 91929·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Douglas B. Meeks appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his petition requesting a concealed carry endorsement. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the trial court was supported by substantial evidence, was not against the weight of the evidence, and did not erroneously declare or apply the law.

*414 Murphy v. Carrón, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meeks v. Lewis, 282 S.W.3d 413, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 685, 2009 WL 1203364 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

282 S.W.3d 413 (Meeks v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. State
282 S.W.3d 413 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)