Miller v. State
365 S.W.3d 652, 2012 WL 1623484, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 609
Opinion
ORDER
Kristopher Miller appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2) & (5).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. State, 365 S.W.3d 652, 2012 WL 1623484, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 609 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
365 S.W.3d 652 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Cuevas
365 S.W.3d 652 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)