McShain Co. v. United States

Court of Claims

McShain Co. v. United States

83 Ct. Cl. 405, 1936 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 244, 1936 WL 2922

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedMay 4, 1936

DocketNo. 43085

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 83 Ct. Cl. 405 (McShain Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McShain Co. v. United States, 83 Ct. Cl. 405, 1936 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 244, 1936 WL 2922 (cc 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Whalev, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The contract in this case provided that the contracting officer should ascertain the facts and the extent of the causes of delay and his findings of facts “shall be final and conclusive.” The contracting officer was the architect of the capitol and he did make a finding of fact that the contractor had been unavoidably delayed by unforeseen events beyond his control and without fault or negligence. The Comptroller General subsequently decided that the contractor was liable for 9% days’ delay and deducted liquidated damages in the sum of $1,662.50. Neither fraud nor bad faith is alleged or proven. This court and the Supreme Court by numerous decisions have held there is no going behind the decision of the contracting officer when the contract provides that “his finding of facts therein shall be final and conclusive on the parties thereto.” The action of the Comptroller General was without legal authority. Kihlberg v. United States, 97 U. S. 398; United States v. Gleason, 175 U. S. 588; Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co., [410]*41076 C. Cls. 154; Penn Bridge Co. v. United States, 59 C. Cls. 892; Carroll v. United States, 76 C. Cls. 103, where all the cases are fully reviewed; Albina Marine Iron Works Inc. v. United States, 79 C. Cls. 714.

The plaintiff is entitled to recover the sum of $1,662.50. It is so ordered.

Williams, Judge; Littleton, Judge; Geeen, Judge; and Booth,t Chief Justice, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whalev, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The contract in this case provided that the contracting officer should ascertain the facts and the extent of the causes of delay and his findings of facts “shall be final and conclusive.” The contracting officer was the architect of the capitol and he did make a finding of fact that the contractor had been unavoidably delayed by unforeseen events beyond his control and without fault or negligence. The Comptroller General subsequently decided that the contractor was liable for 9% days’ delay and deducted liquidated damages in the sum of $1,662.50. Neither fraud nor bad faith is alleged or proven. This court and the Supreme Court by numerous decisions have held there is no going behind the decision of the contracting officer when the contract provides that “his finding of facts therein shall be final and conclusive on the parties thereto.” The action of the Comptroller General was without legal authority. Kihlberg v. United States, 97 U. S. 398; United States v. Gleason, 175 U. S. 588; Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co., [410]*41076 C. Cls. 154; Penn Bridge Co. v. United States, 59 C. Cls. 892; Carroll v. United States, 76 C. Cls. 103, where all the cases are fully reviewed; Albina Marine Iron Works Inc. v. United States, 79 C. Cls. 714.

The plaintiff is entitled to recover the sum of $1,662.50. It is so ordered.

Williams, Judge; Littleton, Judge; Geeen, Judge; and Booth,t Chief Justice, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 Ct. Cl. 405, 1936 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 244, 1936 WL 2922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcshain-co-v-united-states-cc-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack