Jones v. State

110 S.W.3d 828, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 196, 2003 WL 346931
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1636
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 18, 2003·No. No. ED 80565·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eugene Jones, Jr. (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.151 motion for postconviction relief. Appellant claims ineffective assistance of counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 110 S.W.3d 828, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 196, 2003 WL 346931 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

110 S.W.3d 828 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.