Jones v. State

113 S.W.3d 685, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1394, 2003 WL 22048096
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1636
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 2, 2003·No. No. ED 82168·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Chad W. Jones, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. He contends the motion court clearly erred in finding his claim for jail time credit was not cognizable.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 113 S.W.3d 685, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1394, 2003 WL 22048096 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

113 S.W.3d 685 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.