Jones v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Jones v. State

110 S.W.3d 828, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 196, 2003 WL 346931

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 18, 2003

DocketNo. ED 80565

StatusPublished

This text of 110 S.W.3d 828 (Jones v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jones v. State, 110 S.W.3d 828, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 196, 2003 WL 346931 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eugene Jones, Jr. (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15¹ motion for postconviction relief. Appellant claims ineffective assistance of counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eugene Jones, Jr. (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15¹ motion for postconviction relief. Appellant claims ineffective assistance of counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 S.W.3d 828, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 196, 2003 WL 346931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-state-moctapp-2003.