Jones v. State

87 S.W.3d 902, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2060, 2002 WL 31324106
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 2428
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 15, 2002·No. No. ED 80544·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Toney Jones appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing.

Jones was convicted of one count of robbery in the first degree, three counts of attempted robbery in the first degree, four counts of armed criminal action, burglary in the first degree, and possession of a controlled substance. This court affirmed the conviction. State v. Jones, 14 S.W.3d 128 (Mo.App. E.D.2000). Jones filed a motion under Rule 29.15 alleging that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to ade[903]*903quately investigate Jones’s case. The motion court denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 87 S.W.3d 902, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2060, 2002 WL 31324106 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

87 S.W.3d 902 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Jones
14 S.W.3d 128 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000)