Jones v. State

23 S.W.3d 641, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 715, 2000 WL 622884
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 2428
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 16, 2000·No. No. ED 76121·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Alphonso Jones (“Movant”) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We previously affirmed Movant’s convictions for murder in the first degree, Section 565.020 RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, Section 571.015 RSMo 1994, in State v. Jones, 959 S.W.2d 829, 831 (Mo.App.1997).

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 23 S.W.3d 641, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 715, 2000 WL 622884 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).

23 S.W.3d 641 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Jones
959 S.W.2d 829 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1997)