Jones v. State

59 S.W.3d 52, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1861, 2001 WL 1262949
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 2428
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 23, 2001·No. No. ED 79353·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Jody Jones appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We previously affirmed Movant’s conviction for felony stealing, section 570.030, RSMo 2000. State v. Jones, 32 S.W.3d 128 (Mo.App. E.D.2000).

In this appeal, Movant contends his trial attorney provided ineffective assistance by failing to investigate and prepare for trial. Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 59 S.W.3d 52, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1861, 2001 WL 1262949 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

59 S.W.3d 52 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Jones
32 S.W.3d 128 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000)