Jones v. State

62 S.W.3d 640, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 2170, 2001 WL 1544273
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jones v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 2428
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 4, 2001·No. No. ED 79352·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant Jody Jones appeals from a judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing.

The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[641]*641We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. State, 62 S.W.3d 640, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 2170, 2001 WL 1544273 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

62 S.W.3d 640 (Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.