Jarriel v. Jarriel

41 S.E. 262, 115 Ga. 23, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 297
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 26, 1902
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 41 S.E. 262 (Jarriel v. Jarriel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jarriel v. Jarriel, 41 S.E. 262, 115 Ga. 23, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 297 (Ga. 1902).

Opinion

Cobb, J.

Where in a certificate to a bill of exceptions the judge certifies that the bill of exceptions “ as amended.” is true, and the amendment referred to consists of a note by the judge which precedes the certificate and which shows that the bill of exceptions is in part not true, the writ of error must be dismissed. While the judge may supply omissions in a bill of exceptions by interlineations ornotes, any interlineation or note which has the effect of showing that some of the averments in the bill of exceptions are not true will work a dismissal of the writ of error, when the bill of exceptions is certified to be true only “as amended.” Fort v. Sheffield, 108 Ga. 781, and cases cited; Sanges v. State, 110 Ga. 260. See also Johnson v. Equitable Security Company, 113 Ga. 1153, and cases cited.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concurring, except Little and Lewis, JJ., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Musgrove v. Musgrove
139 S.E.2d 315 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)
Fischer v. Carpenter
172 S.E. 464 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)
Eady v. Magnolia Cemetery Co.
166 S.E. 436 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
Keough v. Georgia Power Co.
149 S.E. 435 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Williams v. Atlanta National Bank
120 S.E. 658 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Barclay v. City of Ellijay
109 S.E. 512 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Dorsey v. State
109 S.E. 518 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Holtzendorf v. McNeil
104 S.E. 919 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)
Adamson v. Bradley
93 S.E. 894 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1917)
Love v. Love
91 S.E. 27 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Nichols v. Knowles
89 S.E. 162 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Mills
84 S.E. 120 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1915)
Priester v. Bray
74 S.E. 757 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)
Scott v. Whipple
42 S.E. 519 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 S.E. 262, 115 Ga. 23, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jarriel-v-jarriel-ga-1902.