Fort v. Sheffield

Supreme Court of Georgia

Fort v. Sheffield

33 S.E. 660, 108 Ga. 781, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 403

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJune 3, 1899

StatusPublished

Cited by13 cases

This text of 33 S.E. 660 (Fort v. Sheffield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fort v. Sheffield, 33 S.E. 660, 108 Ga. 781, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 403 (Ga. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

Where in the certificate to a bill of exceptions the judge certifies that the hill of exceptions, “as modified by note of judge,” is true, and such note shows that the bill of exceptions is in large part not true, the writ of error must be dismissed, as this court has no jurisdiction to consider a bill of exceptions which has not been duly certified by the judge to be entirely true. Hawkins v. Americus, 102 Ga. 786, and cases cited. Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simmons, C. J.

Where in the certificate to a bill of exceptions the judge certifies that the hill of exceptions, “as modified by note of judge,” is true, and such note shows that the bill of exceptions is in large part not true, the writ of error must be dismissed, as this court has no jurisdiction to consider a bill of exceptions which has not been duly certified by the judge to be entirely true. Hawkins v. Americus, 102 Ga. 786, and cases cited. Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 S.E. 660, 108 Ga. 781, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fort-v-sheffield-ga-1899.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack