Fort v. Sheffield

33 S.E. 660, 108 Ga. 781, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 403
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 3, 1899·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

Where in the certificate to a bill of exceptions the judge certifies that the hill of exceptions, “as modified by note of judge,” is true, and such note shows that the bill of exceptions is in large part not true, the writ of error must be dismissed, as this court has no jurisdiction to consider a bill of exceptions which has not been duly certified by the judge to be entirely true. Hawkins v. Americus, 102 Ga. 786, and cases cited. Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fort v. Sheffield, 33 S.E. 660, 108 Ga. 781, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 403 (Ga. 1899).

33 S.E. 660 (Fort v. Sheffield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. Pierce
17 S.E.2d 838 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Fischer v. Carpenter
172 S.E. 464 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)
Eady v. Magnolia Cemetery Co.
166 S.E. 436 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
Barclay v. City of Ellijay
109 S.E. 512 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Dorsey v. State
109 S.E. 518 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Nichols v. Knowles
89 S.E. 162 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Clary v. Nash
65 S.E. 301 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Jarriel v. Jarriel
41 S.E. 262 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Johnson v. Equitable Loan & Security Co.
39 S.E. 473 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Bond v. Winn
38 S.E. 328 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Taylor Bros. v. Howard
37 S.E. 392 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)
Sanges v. State
34 S.E. 327 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)