Dorsey v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Dorsey v. State

109 S.E. 518, 27 Ga. App. 637, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 330

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 17, 1921·No. 12778·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

This court has no jurisdiction to consider a bill of exceptions which has not been certified by the judge to be entirely true. Fort v. Sheffield, 108 Ga. 781 (33 S. E. 660), and citation.

(a) In the instant case the judge states, in a note which precedes his certificate, that he cannot certify as to a specified material fact appearing in the bill of exceptions. It follows that under the above ruling the bill of exceptions cannot be entertained by this court. See Jarriel v. Jarriel, 115 Ga. 23 (41 S. E. 262).

Writ of error dismissed.

Luke and Bloodworth, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

This court has no jurisdiction to consider a bill of exceptions which has not been certified by the judge to be entirely true. Fort v. Sheffield, 108 Ga. 781 (33 S. E. 660), and citation.

(a) In the instant case the judge states, in a note which precedes his certificate, that he cannot certify as to a specified material fact appearing in the bill of exceptions. It follows that under the above ruling the bill of exceptions cannot be entertained by this court. See Jarriel v. Jarriel, 115 Ga. 23 (41 S. E. 262).

Writ of error dismissed.

Luke and Bloodworth, J.J., concur.

Dorsey v. State, 109 S.E. 518, 27 Ga. App. 637, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 330 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

109 S.E. 518 (Dorsey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related