Dorsey v. State

109 S.E. 518, 27 Ga. App. 637, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 330
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 17, 1921
Docket12778
StatusPublished

This text of 109 S.E. 518 (Dorsey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dorsey v. State, 109 S.E. 518, 27 Ga. App. 637, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 330 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

This court has no jurisdiction to consider a bill of exceptions which has not been certified by the judge to be entirely true. Fort v. Sheffield, 108 Ga. 781 (33 S. E. 660), and citation.

(a) In the instant case the judge states, in a note which precedes his certificate, that he cannot certify as to a specified material fact appearing in the bill of exceptions. It follows that under the above ruling the bill of exceptions cannot be entertained by this court. See Jarriel v. Jarriel, 115 Ga. 23 (41 S. E. 262).

Writ of error dismissed.

Luke and Bloodworth, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fort v. Sheffield
33 S.E. 660 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Jarriel v. Jarriel
41 S.E. 262 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 S.E. 518, 27 Ga. App. 637, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorsey-v-state-gactapp-1921.