Dorsey v. State
113 S.E. 35, 28 Ga. App. 754, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 831
This text of 113 S.E. 35 (Dorsey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dorsey v. State, 113 S.E. 35, 28 Ga. App. 754, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 831 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).
Opinion
1. The evidence in support of the defense of alibi was not of such probative value as to require a charge on the law of alibi, in the absence of a timely written request. Paulk v. State, 8 Ga. App. 704 (2) (70 S. E. 50), and citations.
2. The defendant’s conviction was amply authorized by the evidence and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
■Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Paulk v. State
70 S.E. 50 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
113 S.E. 35, 28 Ga. App. 754, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorsey-v-state-gactapp-1922.