Dorsey v. State
113 S.E. 35, 28 Ga. App. 754, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 831
Opinion
1. The evidence in support of the defense of alibi was not of such probative value as to require a charge on the law of alibi, in the absence of a timely written request. Paulk v. State, 8 Ga. App. 704 (2) (70 S. E. 50), and citations.
2. The defendant’s conviction was amply authorized by the evidence and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
■Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dorsey v. State, 113 S.E. 35, 28 Ga. App. 754, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 831 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).
113 S.E. 35 (Dorsey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Paulk v. State
70 S.E. 50 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)