Dorsey v. State

98 S.E. 554, 23 Ga. App. 519, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 175
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 7, 1919
Docket10231
StatusPublished

This text of 98 S.E. 554 (Dorsey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dorsey v. State, 98 S.E. 554, 23 Ga. App. 519, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 175 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

The defendant’s motion for a new trial contained only the usual general grounds; the verdict was amply authorized by the evidence; and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new .trial.

Judgment affirmed,.

Bloodworth and Stephens, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 S.E. 554, 23 Ga. App. 519, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dorsey-v-state-gactapp-1919.