Dorsey v. State

98 S.E. 554, 23 Ga. App. 519, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 175
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 7, 1919·No. 10231·Published

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

The defendant’s motion for a new trial contained only the usual general grounds; the verdict was amply authorized by the evidence; and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new .trial.

Judgment affirmed,.

Bloodworth and Stephens, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dorsey v. State, 98 S.E. 554, 23 Ga. App. 519, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 175 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

98 S.E. 554 (Dorsey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.