Barclay v. City of Ellijay

109 S.E. 512, 27 Ga. App. 639, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 333
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 17, 1921·No. 12792·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

“ Where in a certificate to a bill of exceptions the judge certifies that the bill of exceptions ‘ as amended is true, and the amendment referred to consists of a note by the judge which precedes . the certificate and which shows that the bill of exceptions is in part not true, the writ of error must be dismissed. While the judge may supply omissions in a bill of exceptions by interlineations or notes, any interlineation or note which has the effect of showing that some of the averments in the bill of exceptions are not true will work a dismissal of the writ of error, when the bill of exceptions is certified to be true only as amended. Fort v. Sheffield, 108 Ga. 781 [33 S. E. 660], and case cited; Sanges v. State, 110 Ga. 260 [34 S. E. 327]. See also Johnson v. Equitable Security Company, 113 Ga. 1153 [39 S. E. 473], and cases cited.” Jarriel v. Jarriel, 115 Ga. 23 (41 S. E. 262).

[640]*640Decided November 17, 1921. Certiorari; from Gilmer superior court —'Judge Blair. July 8, 1921. A. N. Edwards, T. A. Brown, for plaintiff in error.

Under the above ruling and the facts of the instant case this court has no jurisdiction to consider the bill of exceptions.

Writ of error dismissed.

Lulce and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barclay v. City of Ellijay, 109 S.E. 512, 27 Ga. App. 639, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 333 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

109 S.E. 512 (Barclay v. City of Ellijay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fort v. Sheffield
33 S.E. 660 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Sanges v. State
34 S.E. 327 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Johnson v. Equitable Loan & Security Co.
39 S.E. 473 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Jarriel v. Jarriel
41 S.E. 262 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)