Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Mills
84 S.E. 120, 143 Ga. 47, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 278
Opinion
A certificate to a bill of exceptions, wherein the judge certifies that it is true, “except as hereinafter qualified,” and then adds the qualification after the close of the general certificate, does not amount to a certification that the bill of exceptions as written is true; and the writ of error must be dismissed. Jarriel v. Jarriel, 115 Ga. 23 (41 S. E. 262).
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Mills, 84 S.E. 120, 143 Ga. 47, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 278 (Ga. 1915).
84 S.E. 120 (Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Mills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Musgrove v. Musgrove
139 S.E.2d 315 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)
Bentley v. Gordon
2 S.E.2d 912 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Eady v. Magnolia Cemetery Co.
166 S.E. 436 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
Keough v. Georgia Power Co.
149 S.E. 435 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Collier v. Moore
120 S.E. 441 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
McLean v. Mann
95 S.E. 985 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1918)
Adamson v. Bradley
93 S.E. 894 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1917)
Love v. Love
91 S.E. 27 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Nichols v. Knowles
89 S.E. 162 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)